Loading ForensicBlock
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
We're not an investigation tool. We're not a KYT vendor. We're a forensics company — we produce court-ready, independently verifiable blockchain evidence. Chain of custody. Examiner declaration. FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication. Opposing counsel verifies it in a browser without an account. Investigation answers what happened; forensics answers can you prove it to a court. We produce the exhibit.
A world where blockchain evidence is held to the same standard as any other forensic exhibit — reproducible, independently verifiable, and defensible on a witness stand — so that digital-asset wrongdoing can be proven to a court, not merely alleged.
Every day we turn on-chain activity into court-ready, independently verifiable evidence — SHA-256 sealed, chain-of-custody tracked, and reproducible — so litigators, trustees, and asset-recovery counsel can prove what happened to a court, not just investigate it.
Chainalysis, TRM, and Elliptic own intelligence and screening — what an address is and what your risk exposure is. Nobody has claimed the forensics category: evidence built to the standard a courtroom demands — reproducible, independently verifiable, defensible on a stand. That seam is our position, and it is literally our name.
Investigation answers 'what happened.' Forensics answers 'can you prove it to a court.' We produce the exhibit.
What the proprietary incumbents cannot ship: attribution you can republish in an exhibit (their label databases are license-locked), a public verifier opposing counsel can open without an account, and an exportable, self-hashed Audit Pack that lets a defense expert re-derive the work.
A black box can't take the stand: the incumbents' label databases are license-locked and can't be republished in an exhibit, while ForensicBlock attribution ships with sources and confidence you can file — behind a public, versioned methodology anyone can read.
Verify a real sealed report in a browser — the verifier recomputes the SHA-256 seal live. No account required.
Verify a sealed reportVersioned and content-hashed, published in full. Same input, same output — reproducible across runs.
Read the methodologyBring one real address from a real matter and see the record we build — the preliminary trace runs as part of scoping, before any engagement fee.
Request a scope callReports are built as exhibits, not intelligence reads: FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication packaging, an examiner-of-record posture, and a methodology that is versioned and disclosed. We never represent that a sealed report is automatically admissible — self-authentication is not admissibility, and we say so on the page.
Every report carries a SHA-256 seal a reviewer recomputes live, and opposing counsel can open the public verifier in a browser with no account. The exportable, self-hashed Audit Pack lets a defense expert re-derive the record — verification does not depend on trusting us.
Daubert-aligned: the same input yields the same output. The deterministic verdict and scoring engine never learns, so a past run stays reproducible even as the catalog grows; the methodology hash and the sanctions/attribution catalog state at generation time are disclosed as required reproduction inputs.
A hash-chained audit log records every mutation; the audit lineage is independently timestamped under RFC 3161 and anchored to Bitcoin via OpenTimestamps. Six forensic agents — Tracer, Sentinel, Examiner, Hunter, Custodian, Sealer — carry evidence from first trace to sealed exhibit.
We trace digital assets across 7 live chains to their landing endpoints, name the records-holding institutions that are the real subpoena targets, and hand recovery counsel subpoena-ready packages — turning a trace into an actionable path to the funds.
No fabricated data: every number on screen links to a real surface, org-scoped data refuses missing context with a visible refusal rather than a silent empty, and an honest empty is never a hidden error. The honesty contract is the brand moat, and it is enforced in code.
Each agent owns one link in the chain of custody, so the record is assembled the same way every time and every step is reproducible.
Multi-hop fund-flow tracing with bridge and mixer detection
OFAC/SDN screening and per-factor risk scoring
Behavioral pattern analysis — peel chains, fan-out, layering, anomalies
Recovery probability assessment and exchange identification
Real-time address monitoring and custody-relevant event capture
Evidence compilation and sealed, court-ready report generation
Built for the people who have to defend the work on a stand — litigators, trustees, asset-recovery counsel, expert witnesses, and the law-enforcement and compliance teams working digital-asset matters. AmLaw litigation practices are the wedge.
AmLaw litigation practices building the fund-flow record for a complaint, motion, or trial exhibit.
Bankruptcy and receivership estates locating, tracing, and marshalling digital assets.
Recovery teams that need the landing endpoint, the records-holder, and a subpoena-ready package.
Experts who have to defend the methodology on a stand under a Daubert challenge.
LE and compliance units working digital-asset matters that must survive review.
Start with a free preliminary trace, or open a real sealed report and verify the seal yourself — no account required.