Loading ForensicBlock
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Preparing your blockchain forensics platform...
Investigation answers 'what happened.' Forensics answers 'can you prove it to a court.' We produce the exhibit. Tracer builds the fund-flow record, Reports seals the exhibit, Monitoring captures custody-relevant events — and every surface serves one output: a sealed record opposing counsel can verify independently, no account required.
Trace, seal, capture — plus the screening, recovery, and context surfaces that feed the same sealed record. Engagements are scoped per matter on a Statement of Work.
Build the fund-flow record
Step one of the chain of evidence. Value-weighted multi-hop tracing with glass-box entity attribution — sources and confidence you can republish in an exhibit — and a disclosed taint methodology. Coverage: Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, Avalanche, and Tron (TRC-20) live today; BNB Smart Chain and Bitcoin in active development.
Seal the exhibit
The step that turns a trace into evidence: FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication packaging, a hash-chained chain-of-custody log, and a SHA-256 seal any reviewer can recompute at the public verifier — no account required.
Custody-relevant event capture
Monitoring in service of the record: webhook-driven capture of movements on monitored addresses, KYT screening on a five-minute cadence, and alerts that open an investigation record — so post-seal activity is captured, not missed.
Forensic agents, glass-box
Conversational access to the case record. 6 forensic agents work under the deterministic engines — their prose must match the engine output and carry its caveats, never silently override it.
Deterministic, versioned, disclosed
Risk scoring under a versioned methodology — same input, same output, forever. Sanctions screening resolves live-first, and every determination discloses its source and freshness; a stale snapshot is labeled stale, never presented as current.
For asset-recovery matters
BIP39 seed phrase analysis for asset-recovery engagements. Discover derived addresses, check balances across chains, and identify illicit connections — findings land in the same case record as the rest of the evidence.
Jurisdictional context
Geographic context for cross-border matters: exchange jurisdiction tracking and jurisdiction risk context that inform where records-holding entities can be served — supporting context for the record, never a verdict driver.
What the proprietary incumbents cannot ship: attribution you can republish in an exhibit (their label databases are license-locked), a public verifier opposing counsel can open without an account, and an exportable, self-hashed Audit Pack that lets a defense expert re-derive the work.
A free preliminary trace is the door. Engagements are scoped per matter on a Statement of Work — the eDiscovery rhythm your firm already knows, with no idle seats.
The verdict engine is versioned and deterministic — same input, same output — and the methodology hash ships in the exhibit. 6 forensic agents work under it, never over it.
Opposing counsel opens the public verifier in a browser and recomputes the SHA-256 seal — no account, no trust in us required. Verification does not depend on taking our word.
Sealed, court-ready blockchain evidence opposing counsel can verify at our public verifier — no account required. Start with a free preliminary trace; engagements are scoped per matter on a Statement of Work.